Latest News & Resources

The Enterprise Software Playbook (That Doesn't Work for AI)

Your company just signed a $2M contract with a major AI vendor.

The sales pitch was compelling. Deploy their platform. Access pre-built models. Get AI capabilities in weeks, not months. No data scientists needed.

Six months later: The platform is deployed. Your team attended training. The dashboard looks impressive.

AI models in production: Zero.

Business value delivered: Zero.

You fell into the AI vendor trap.

Here is the uncomfortable truth: Buying AI software is fundamentally different from buying enterprise software. The ERP playbook does not work. The CRM deployment strategy fails. What worked for every other technology transformation breaks spectacularly for AI.

A 2024 McKinsey study found that 71% of enterprises that purchased AI platforms failed to deploy meaningful AI capabilities within 18 months. They spent an average of $3.8M on software and services. Most had nothing to show for it.

The problem is not the vendors. The problem is the assumption that AI transformation can be purchased.

Why the Vendor Approach Fails

Let us be direct about what buying an AI platform actually gets you.

What You Actually Buy

You buy software. A platform with APIs, dashboards, pre-built models, and integration capabilities.

You buy professional services. Implementation consultants who configure the platform, integrate it with your systems, and train your team.

You buy support. Access to technical support when things break.

This works perfectly for traditional enterprise software. Buy Salesforce, implement it, train users, and you have a CRM.

But AI is different.

What You Do Not Buy

You do not buy AI capability. The platform cannot identify which business problems AI should solve. The consultants cannot determine which use cases deliver ROI in your specific context.

You do not buy organizational change. The platform cannot restructure workflows. It cannot convince skeptical users to adopt new processes. It cannot navigate organizational politics.

You do not buy domain expertise. Pre-built models are generic. They do not understand your business, your data, your constraints, your customers.

You do not buy continuous improvement. AI models degrade. Data drifts. Business conditions change. Maintaining AI requires ongoing effort that vendors do not provide.

The gap between what you buy and what you need is enormous. And expensive.

The Four Vendor Trap Patterns

Most companies fall into one of four traps.

Trap 1: The Feature Trap

The Mistake: Buying AI platforms because they have impressive features. Natural language processing! Computer vision! Automated machine learning!

What Happens: Your team explores features. Builds demos. Attends webinars. But never deploys anything that drives business value.

Why It Fails: Features do not equal use cases. Having NLP capability does not mean you have a business problem that NLP solves profitably.

Real Example: A manufacturing company bought an AI platform with 37 pre-built models. Impressive feature list. After 12 months, they used exactly one model—a basic anomaly detection that could have been built with open-source tools for $50K instead of the $1.8M they spent.

Cost: $1.75M wasted on unused capabilities.

Trap 2: The Integration Trap

The Mistake: Assuming the platform will integrate seamlessly with your existing systems.

What Happens: Implementation takes 9-12 months instead of the promised 6-8 weeks. Integration requires extensive custom development. Your IT team becomes a bottleneck.

Why It Fails: Vendors demo clean environments with standard data formats. Your reality is 40 legacy systems with inconsistent data, undocumented APIs, and IT policies that require 6-month security reviews.

Real Example: A financial services firm bought an AI platform. Vendor demo showed seamless integration with Salesforce and SQL databases. Reality: Their customer data was fragmented across 12 systems, some from the 1990s. Integration required 14 months of custom development costing $3.2M—more than the platform itself.

Cost: $3.2M in unexpected integration costs plus 14-month delay.

Trap 3: The Skill Trap

The Mistake: Believing that "no coding required" means no skills required.

What Happens: Platform is deployed. Users are trained on how to use the interface. But they do not understand when to use AI, what problems it solves, or how to interpret results.

Why It Fails: AI platforms lower the technical barrier. But they do not eliminate the need for AI judgment. You still need people who understand model limitations, data quality requirements, and business context.

Real Example: A retail company deployed an AI platform with "citizen data scientist" capabilities. Non-technical users could build models through drag-and-drop. Result: Users built 23 models. Only 2 were statistically valid. 21 had fundamental flaws (data leakage, overfitting, wrong problem formulation). None delivered business value.

Cost: $600K platform cost plus 8 months of wasted effort.

Trap 4: The Ownership Trap

The Mistake: Assuming the vendor owns your AI success.

What Happens: When models fail or do not deliver value, you escalate to the vendor. They say "the platform is working as designed" (which is true). The problem is not the platform. The problem is your use cases, your data, your organization.

Why It Fails: Vendors sell software. They do not own your business outcomes. When your AI initiative fails, they still got paid.

Real Example: A logistics company bought an AI platform for route optimization. After 10 months, the models were deployed but routes were not actually optimized. Why? The models optimized for total distance. But the business priority was on-time delivery, which requires different optimization logic. Vendor response: "The platform is working correctly. You need to change your requirements."

Cost: $2.1M spent on platform that solved the wrong problem.

What Actually Drives AI Success

If buying platforms does not work, what does?

Success Factor 1: Strategic Clarity

Before buying any platform, answer these questions:

Which business problems are we solving? Not "we want AI." But "we want to reduce customer churn by 15%" or "we want to cut inventory costs by $5M."

What is the business value? Specific, measurable value. Not "AI will improve our operations." But "reducing manual invoice processing from 4 hours to 30 minutes saves $840K annually."

What capabilities do we need? Based on the business problem, what AI capabilities matter? Maybe you need simple classification, not the vendor's impressive deep learning features.

Do we have the organizational readiness? Will users adopt AI-driven processes? Do we have people who can interpret model outputs and act on them?

Most companies skip this step. They buy platforms first, then try to figure out what to do with them.

That is backwards.

Success Factor 2: Start with Use Cases, Not Technology

The right sequence:

Step 1: Identify high-value use cases. Where can AI drive measurable business value?

Step 2: Validate the use case. Build a proof-of-concept. Does AI actually work for this problem? Does it deliver the expected value?

Step 3: Assess capability needs. What technology, skills, and processes do we need to scale this use case?

Step 4: Evaluate options. Build in-house? Partner with consultants? Buy a platform? Which approach best meets our needs?

Notice: You buy technology last, not first.

Success Factor 3: Partner for Capability, Not Just Software

Instead of buying software and hoping it works, partner with firms that provide:

Strategic consulting: Help identify use cases, prioritize them, and build business cases.

Implementation expertise: Actually build and deploy models that solve your business problems.

Organizational change management: Help users adopt AI-driven workflows.

Continuous improvement: Maintain models, handle drift, optimize performance.

Firms like ITSoli do not just sell you software. They partner with you to build AI capability.

The economics work differently too. You pay for outcomes, not features. If the use case does not deliver value, you have not wasted $2M on a platform you cannot use.

The Build-Partner-Buy Framework

Here is how to think about AI technology decisions.

When to Build

Build when: AI is your core competitive differentiator. You are creating proprietary AI that competitors should not access. You have 10+ models in production and proven ROI.

Investment: $2M-$5M annually. 8-15 person team. 12-18 months to first production model.

Most companies are not here yet.

When to Partner

Partner when: You are early in your AI journey (first 3-5 models). You need proven expertise fast. You want to test AI value before big investments. You lack specialized skills in-house.

Investment: $300K-$800K annually. Access to senior consultants. 10-12 weeks to first production model.

This is where most companies should start.

When to Buy

Buy when: You have proven use cases with clear requirements. You need specific capabilities the platform provides. You have the skills to configure and maintain the platform. You have validated that the platform solves your problem.

Investment: $500K-$3M for platform plus $500K-$2M for implementation. 6-12 months to production.

Notice: You buy after you have proven value, not before.

Case Study: Two Paths to AI

Two insurance companies started AI initiatives in 2023.

Company A: Vendor-First Approach

Approach: Bought a $2.8M AI platform. Hired implementation consultants ($1.2M). Spent 14 months implementing.

Results after 18 months: Platform deployed. Three models in production. Business value: Unclear. Models were technically functional but did not align with business priorities. User adoption: 23%. The platform could do 50 things. They used 3.

Total spend: $4M. Measurable ROI: Negative.

Company B: Partner-First Approach

Approach: Partnered with ITSoli. Started with use case identification workshop. Built first model in 90-day sprint ($85K). Validated business value. Built second model. Then third.

Results after 18 months: Six models in production. Claims processing time reduced 68%. Underwriting accuracy improved from 79% to 91%. Customer satisfaction up 14 points. Annual value: $8.3M.

Total spend: $650K. ROI: 1,277% in year 1.

What made the difference? Company B focused on business outcomes first, technology second. Company A bought technology and hoped business value would follow.

The ITSoli Alternative

ITSoli does not sell AI platforms. We sell AI transformation.

What We Actually Do

Use Case Discovery: We help you identify which business problems AI should solve. Which use cases deliver ROI. Which should be prioritized.

Proof of Value: We build proof-of-concepts fast (90 days). Validate that AI actually works for your use case. Measure business impact.

Production Deployment: We take validated models to production. Handle integration, user training, change management.

Continuous Improvement: We monitor performance, handle model drift, and optimize over time.

Knowledge Transfer: We train your team. Build internal capability. Eventually, you own the AI capability.

Why This Works Better Than Buying Platforms

You pay for outcomes, not features. If a use case does not deliver value, you do not waste $2M on unused software.

You start fast. First model in production in 10-12 weeks, not 12-18 months.

You focus resources. Spend money on use cases that matter, not on platform capabilities you will never use.

You build capability. Our goal is to make you self-sufficient, not dependent on our software.

Engagement Models

90-Day Sprint: $75K-$125K. One use case from discovery to production. Prove value before bigger investments.

Annual Partnership: $400K-$800K. Ongoing engagement. Build 3-5 models per year. Fractional AI team.

Transformation Program: $1M-$2M. Multi-year engagement. Build comprehensive AI capability across the organization.

All models focus on business outcomes, not software licenses.

The Uncomfortable Question

Here is the question vendors do not want you to ask:

"If we spend $2M on your platform and fail to deliver business value, who owns that failure?"

The answer is always: You do.

Vendors sell software. They do not own your outcomes.

When you partner with firms like ITSoli, we own outcomes with you. If the use case does not deliver value, we have not succeeded either.

That alignment changes everything.

Stop Buying, Start Building

The enterprise software playbook does not work for AI.

You cannot buy AI transformation. You can only build it.

Platforms are tools. They do not replace strategy. They do not eliminate the need for expertise. They do not guarantee business value.

The companies succeeding with AI are not the ones with the most expensive platforms. They are the ones with:

Clear use cases. Measurable business value. Organizational readiness. Iterative learning. Partner support when needed.

Technology comes last, not first.

Before you sign your next AI platform contract, ask yourself:

Do we know which business problems we are solving? Have we validated that AI actually works for these problems? Do we have the skills and processes to deploy and maintain AI? Are we prepared to change how our organization works?

If the answer to any of these is no, you are not ready to buy a platform.

Partner first. Prove value. Build capability. Then decide if you need to buy a platform.

That is how AI transformation actually works.