Latest News & Resources

The Budget Approval Dance

Your board approved a $5M AI budget for 2025.

You are excited. Finally, resources to transform the business with AI. Build a team. Deploy models. Drive real value.

Twelve months later, the CFO asks: "What did we get for $5M?"

You present: Platform licenses ($1.8M). Headcount (5 people, $1.2M). Consulting and training ($800K). Infrastructure ($600K). Other expenses ($600K).

CFO: "I know what we spent. What value did we create?"

You hesitate. Three models in production. User adoption is low. Business impact is unclear.

Measured ROI: Unknown. Likely negative.

You spent $5M. You delivered maybe $500K of measurable business value.

This is the AI budget illusion. Big budgets do not equal big outcomes. In fact, they often guarantee waste.

Where AI Budgets Go to Die

Let us dissect where $5M actually goes.

Death by Platform Licenses

Typical allocation: $1.5M-$2M for AI platform licenses.

The pitch: Access to enterprise AI platform. Pre-built models. No-code interfaces. Deploy AI in weeks.

The reality: You use 20% of the features. Most pre-built models do not fit your use cases. You still need data scientists to make anything work.

What you needed: Focused tooling for specific use cases. Maybe $200K-$400K.

Waste: $1.1M-$1.6M on unused capabilities.

Death by Hiring

Typical allocation: $1M-$1.5M for AI talent (4-6 people).

The pitch: Build an in-house AI team. Data scientists and ML engineers who understand our business.

The reality: Takes 9-12 months to hire. Ramp time 3-6 months. First production model 18 months after starting.

Meanwhile: Competitors partnered with consultants. Deployed first model in 12 weeks. Built momentum while you were still recruiting.

What you needed: Fractional AI expertise for first 3-5 models. Prove value before hiring. Maybe $400K-$600K.

Waste: $400K-$900K in delayed value plus opportunity cost.

Death by Consulting Theater

Typical allocation: $500K-$1M for AI consulting.

The pitch: Big consulting firm will assess your readiness, develop AI strategy, create roadmap.

The reality: Six months later, you have a 200-slide deck. Beautiful frameworks. Comprehensive roadmap. Zero models deployed.

What you needed: Consulting firms that actually build models, not just PowerPoints. Deploy value, not strategies.

Waste: $300K-$700K on analysis that never becomes action.

Death by Infrastructure Overkill

Typical allocation: $500K-$800K for infrastructure.

The pitch: Enterprise-grade ML infrastructure. Auto-scaling. Monitoring. Model registry. Feature store.

The reality: You deploy your first model 14 months later. It runs on a single server. Your "enterprise infrastructure" sits mostly idle.

What you needed: Start simple. Single cloud instance. Add complexity as you scale.

Waste: $300K-$600K on premature infrastructure.

Death by Training Theater

Typical allocation: $200K-$400K for AI training.

The pitch: Train everyone on AI. Executives get AI for leaders. Managers get AI fundamentals. Individual contributors get hands-on ML.

The reality: Training is interesting. People enjoy the workshops. Then they go back to their jobs. Nothing changes. No models get built.

What you needed: Just-in-time training for people actually building AI. Not blanket training for everyone.

Waste: $150K-$300K on training that does not drive deployment.

The Total Waste Calculation

Add it up:

Platform waste: $1.1M-$1.6M. Hiring delay cost: $400K-$900K. Consulting waste: $300K-$700K. Infrastructure waste: $300K-$600K. Training waste: $150K-$300K.

Total waste: $2.25M-$4.1M out of $5M budget.

Waste percentage: 45-82%.

You spent $5M. Maybe $1M-$2.5M actually contributed to deploying AI that drives business value.

The rest? Organizational overhead, premature investment, and bad sequencing.

The Right Way to Allocate AI Budget

Here is what high-performing AI organizations do differently.

Principle 1: Start Small, Prove Value, Scale Investment

Do not approve a $5M AI budget upfront. Approve a $500K pilot budget.

Use it to: Build 2-3 production models. Measure business impact. Prove ROI. Learn what capabilities you actually need.

If pilots succeed, unlock additional budget. If they fail, you wasted $500K, not $5M.

Example: A healthcare company allocated $400K for AI pilots. Built three models over six months. Measured $3.2M in annual value. Then they approved $2M to scale. By year 2, they had proven ROI and organizational capability.

Contrast: A competitor allocated $4.5M upfront. Spent 18 months on platforms, hiring, and infrastructure. Deployed one model with unclear ROI.

Principle 2: Budget for Outcomes, Not Inputs

Stop budgeting for "AI team" or "AI platform." Start budgeting for use cases.

Wrong budget:

- AI team: $1.2M

- Platform: $1.8M

- Infrastructure: $600K

- Training: $400K

- Total: $4M

Right budget:

- Use case 1 (claims automation): $200K, target ROI: $1.2M annually

- Use case 2 (fraud detection): $250K, target ROI: $3M annually

- Use case 3 (customer churn): $180K, target ROI: $800K annually

- Use case 4 (demand forecasting): $220K, target ROI: $2.1M annually

- Reserve for new use cases: $150K

- Total: $1M, target value: $7.1M annually

This budget tells a story. Each line item has expected business value. You can measure success. If use case 2 fails, you do not abandon the program—you learn and adjust.

Principle 3: Sequence Investments

AI capability builds in stages. Your budget should match the journey.

Stage 1 (Months 1-6): Prove Value

Budget: $300K-$600K

Spend on: Partnerships with firms like ITSoli. Build 2-3 models. Measure business impact.

Goal: Validate that AI drives value in your organization.

Stage 2 (Months 7-12): Build Momentum

Budget: $600K-$1.2M

Spend on: Scale successful models. Build 3-5 new models. Light infrastructure (what you actually need).

Goal: Build portfolio of 5-8 production models with proven ROI.

Stage 3 (Year 2): Build Capability

Budget: $1.5M-$3M

Spend on: Hire 2-4 permanent AI engineers (you now know what skills you need). Invest in infrastructure (now that you have scale). Targeted training (for people actually doing AI).

Goal: Transition from partnered to in-house capability.

Notice: You spend the most after you have proven value. Not before.

Principle 4: Favor Variable Costs Over Fixed Costs

Fixed costs (platforms, headcount, infrastructure) commit you to spending regardless of results.

Variable costs (consulting partnerships, project-based engagements) scale with value delivered.

Better budget allocation:

Instead of: $1.8M platform license (fixed). Shift to: $400K tooling (what you actually need) plus $800K variable spend on consultants who deliver models.

Instead of: $1.2M hiring 5 people upfront (fixed). Shift to: $400K for 2 people in-house plus $600K retainer with ITSoli for fractional team (scales up/down).

Instead of: $600K infrastructure upfront (fixed). Shift to: $150K for initial infrastructure, add capacity as models scale.

Total fixed: $950K instead of $3.6M. Total variable: $1.4M that scales with model deployment.

If AI does not work, you wasted $950K, not $3.6M. If AI works, variable costs automatically increase to support growth.

The Zero-Based AI Budget

Forget what you spent last year. Start from zero.

Ask: "If we had to justify every dollar of AI spending based on business value delivered, what would we fund?"

This exercise reveals waste.

Questions That Expose Waste

"What business value did our AI platform deliver last year?" If the answer is unclear, why are we renewing the license?

"Which pre-built models did we actually use?" If the answer is "two out of forty," why are we paying for forty?

"How many people on our AI team deployed production models?" If half the team is not shipping, why are we funding them?

"Which AI training programs led to deployed models?" If training does not correlate with deployment, why are we funding it?

"What infrastructure capacity are we actually using?" If we built for 100 models and have 3, why did we overbuild?

Most organizations realize 40-60% of their AI budget does not drive business value.

Case Study: Budget Reallocation Transforms Results

A financial services company had a $4.2M AI budget. After 14 months: Two models in production. Business value: minimal. Team morale: low.

New CTO conducted zero-based budget review.

Found: $1.6M platform (using 25% of features). $1.1M headcount (3 out of 5 people actively deploying). $700K consulting (mostly strategy docs, no models). $500K infrastructure (80% idle). $300K training (no correlation with deployment).

Waste identified: $2.4M out of $4.2M (57%).

Reallocation: Kept 2 in-house engineers ($400K). Partnered with ITSoli for delivery ($900K). Cut unused platform features (-$1M). Right-sized infrastructure (-$300K). Eliminated strategy consulting (-$500K). Focused training on practitioners (-$200K).

New budget: $1.8M (reduced from $4.2M).

Results after 12 months: 11 models in production (up from 2). Measured business value: $12.3M annually. ROI: 683%.

They cut budget 57% and increased results 10x.

The ITSoli Budget-Efficient Model

ITSoli partnerships deliver better outcomes at lower cost.

What $500K Gets You

Instead of: $1.8M platform, $1.2M team, $600K infrastructure, total $3.6M with uncertain outcomes.

With ITSoli: Three 90-day sprints ($225K). One annual retainer for ongoing support ($200K). Light infrastructure ($75K). Total: $500K.

Outcomes: 3-4 production models. Measured business value. Proven ROI. Knowledge transfer to your team.

Savings: $3.1M. Better outcomes: Guaranteed.

Why This Works

Pay for deployed models, not unused capability. No platform licenses for features you will never use.

Variable cost structure. Scale up when deploying models. Scale down between projects.

No hiring delay. Start deploying in weeks, not months.

Proven methodology. We have done this 100+ times. We know what works.

Knowledge transfer. We train your team. Eventually, you own the capability.

Engagement Models

Pilot Program: $300K-$500K. Prove value with 2-3 models. Measure business impact. Minimal risk.

Annual Partnership: $600K-$1M. Build 4-6 models per year. Continuous deployment. Flexible capacity.

Transformation Program: $1.2M-$2M. Multi-year engagement. Build comprehensive capability. 10+ models per year.

All models focus on business outcomes per dollar spent.

The Budget Conversation with Your CFO

When your CFO asks: "Why should we approve $3M for AI?"

Wrong answer: "AI is strategic. Competitors are investing. We need to build capabilities."

Right answer: "We are requesting $500K to build three models with projected $4.2M in annual value. If we hit 50% of target, ROI is 420%. If these succeed, we will request $1M for six more models next quarter."

CFOs understand ROI. They do not understand "strategic AI investment."

When they push back on costs, show them the waste in typical AI budgets:

"Traditional approach costs $3M-$5M with uncertain outcomes. We are proposing $500K with clear business cases. If it does not work, we lost $500K, not $5M."

Risk-adjusted thinking wins CFO support.

Stop Wasting, Start Measuring

The AI budget illusion persists because companies do not measure value per dollar spent.

They measure: Money spent. Headcount hired. Platform features. Models trained.

They do not measure: Business value delivered per dollar. ROI per model. Value per person on the AI team.

Start measuring what matters:

Value delivered per $100K invested. How much business value do we create per budget dollar?

Time to value. How long from budget approval to measurable business impact?

Resource efficiency. What percentage of our AI budget actually deploys production models?

Portfolio ROI. Across all AI initiatives, what is our aggregate return?

These metrics expose waste. They force discipline. They ensure budget allocates to value, not theater.

The Uncomfortable Truth

Here is what AI vendors, big consultancies, and platform companies do not want you to know:

You probably need 20% of the budget you think you need.

Big budgets do not equal big outcomes. They equal big waste.

The companies succeeding with AI are not the ones spending the most. They are the ones spending the smartest.

Small budgets. Focused investments. Measured outcomes. Rapid iteration. Partner support.

That is how you turn $500K into $5M of value.

Not by spending $5M and hoping something works.

Fix your AI budget. Fix your AI outcomes.