Latest News & Resources

The Illusion of Model-Centric Thinking

Most enterprises assume that an AI initiative begins with picking the right model—GPT vs. Claude, Vision Transformer vs. CNN, or open-source vs. proprietary. They form steering committees, debate tech stacks, and choose vendors based on benchmarking scores. But here is the reality: in 90 percent of enterprise failures, the model was not the problem. The workflow was.

AI does not operate in a vacuum. It sits inside human and machine workflows—processes, policies, systems, and behaviors that define how an enterprise actually functions. If the AI solution is not wired into these realities, even the most accurate model will sit idle.

In other words, the challenge is not just engineering better models. It is reengineering how decisions flow.

The Gap Between AI Design and Business Execution

Consider a large insurance company that deploys a powerful claims triage model. On paper, the model performs with 94 percent accuracy in test environments. But once in production, adoption stalls.

Why?

• Claims officers override the model due to lack of trust
• The model output is not integrated into existing claims platforms
• Business rules still require manual flags for certain jurisdictions
• There is no SLA for IT to act on low-confidence predictions

In this case, the model was fine. But the workflow—how outputs triggered actions, how decisions were escalated, how trust was earned—was broken.

This is the pattern across industries. Retailers build demand forecasting models but fail to connect them to purchasing systems. Banks launch risk models that do not align with how compliance teams operate. Manufacturers use vision models that are not embedded in quality control routines.

These are not AI problems. They are workflow design failures.

What an AI-Ready Workflow Looks Like

An AI-ready workflow is not one where you plug in a model and hope for the best. It is one where the entire path from signal to action is designed to absorb, trust, and act on AI insights. This requires:

• Clear handoffs: Who owns the next step after the AI makes a prediction?
• Business alignment: Is the AI solving a decision bottleneck, not just a technical curiosity?
• Process triggers: What specific steps or actions does the AI output initiate?
• Trust levers: How is the AI made explainable, verifiable, or override-able?
• Feedback loops: How are human corrections fed back into the system?

Let us take a supply chain example. A demand forecasting model is embedded into a procurement planning tool. Each forecast includes a confidence score. If the score drops below 80 percent, the system automatically flags a procurement manager. That manager sees the prediction, the reasons behind the dip, and historical model accuracy in similar scenarios. They approve, revise, or reject the recommendation. Their choice and rationale are logged, and the system uses this to refine future forecasts.

That is an AI-ready workflow.

Shifting the Enterprise Lens: From Model-Centric to Flow-Centric

So how do you get there?

It begins by changing how you frame the problem. Instead of asking:

• “What can this model do?”
• “What use case can we solve with AI?”
• “Which LLM performs best on this benchmark?”

Ask instead:

• “What decision takes too long, too many people, or too much cost?”
• “What process breaks when volume spikes?”
• “What would we automate if we trusted the insight source?”

These are workflow-first questions. They look for structural inefficiencies, decision bottlenecks, and high-friction interfaces between teams or tools. Once identified, the model is only one part of the redesign.

Here is what a workflow-first AI strategy looks like:

Notice where the model selection happens: in the middle, not the start.

Organizational Implications

Rewiring workflows for AI is not a technical task alone. It demands cross-functional collaboration and process ownership. Three major shifts need to happen:

1. Product Thinking in AI

Treat AI initiatives like product features, not pilot experiments. That means owning not just the model but the entire experience: how it is used, how it is supported, and how success is measured.

2. Business Process Co-Design

Involve business users from the outset. They hold the mental model of how the process works today—and how it could work tomorrow. Co-design workshops are more valuable than lab-based fine-tuning.

3. Incentives and KPIs

Change how success is measured. Instead of model precision, track cycle time reduction, cost-to-serve, or issue resolution speed. If the AI does not change these, it is not delivering value.

Common Workflow Barriers to Watch

Enterprises often underestimate how hard it is to change workflows. Here are the most common roadblocks:

• Over-standardized processes: AI needs flexibility to learn from edge cases, not rigid SOPs.
• Shadow workflows: Employees often build Excel or email-based workarounds. AI needs to account for these.
• Legacy systems: Even if the AI model is modern, if it writes to a database no one uses, it will be ignored.
• Role friction: If the AI changes who owns a task, expect resistance unless roles are redefined clearly.

Tackling these is not glamorous—but it is the real work of transformation.

Why This Approach Pays Off

When AI is workflow-native, the payoff is exponential. You do not just get faster insights—you get faster operations. Decisions flow better. Teams collaborate with less friction. Systems talk to each other with less mediation.

More importantly, AI becomes invisible. It stops being a shiny tool on the side and becomes part of how the enterprise runs. That is when transformation sticks.