Latest News & Resources

The Data Lake Illusion

Five years ago, your organization built a data lake. The promise was simple: dump all your data into one place, and insights would emerge.

You invested millions. You hired data engineers. You migrated petabytes of data. You told the business that self- service analytics was coming.

Today, that data lake is a swamp.

Data teams spend 80% of their time hunting for the right data. Business users cannot find what they need. Models train on stale or incorrect data. The same features get engineered five different times by five different teams.

The data lake did not fail because of technology. It failed because of philosophy. Treating data as a dumping ground does not make it useful. It makes it overwhelming.

The future of enterprise data is not lakes. It is products. Data products are curated, documented, versioned, and owned. They have SLAs, consumers, and roadmaps. They treat data like the strategic asset it is — not like the byproduct of operations.

This article explores why data lakes fail AI initiatives and how data products succeed.

Why Data Lakes Become Data Swamps

The data lake concept was well-intentioned. Store all your data in one place — structured, semi-structured, unstructured — and let analysts query it as needed.

The problem is execution. Here is what actually happens:

Problem 1: No Schema, No Standards

Data lakes encourage "schema-on-read." Dump data now, figure out structure later.

Result: Every dataset has a different format. Column names are inconsistent. Timestamps use different timezones. Nobody knows what "customer_id" vs "cust_id" vs "customer_key" means.

Analysts waste weeks reconciling data instead of analyzing it.

Problem 2: No Ownership

Who owns the "customer" table in your data lake? Marketing? Sales? IT?

Nobody knows. And because nobody owns it, nobody maintains it. Fields stop updating. Documentation disappears. Data quality degrades.

By the time someone needs the data, it is too broken to use.

Problem 3: No Discoverability

Your data lake has 50,000 tables. Which one contains customer churn risk? Which one has the latest pricing data?

Without a data catalog — with metadata, lineage, and documentation — finding the right data is archaeology. Teams give up and build their own datasets, duplicating work and fragmenting truth.

Problem 4: No Quality Guarantees

Data lakes do not enforce quality. If a source system sends null values, the lake accepts them. If a field changes meaning, the lake does not notice.

Result: Models train on garbage data and produce garbage predictions. You do not discover the problem until production.

Problem 5: No Access Control

Some data should not be shared widely (PII, financial records, trade secrets). Data lakes often treat all data as equally accessible — or lock it all down, making nothing accessible.

The result: Either security breaches or nobody can use the data.

The Shift From Lakes to Products

The data product paradigm changes everything.

Instead of treating data as a raw material, you treat it as a finished good — something crafted, maintained, and delivered to consumers.

What is a data product?

A data product is a reusable dataset that:

• Solves a specific business need
• Has a clear owner and SLA
• Is documented and discoverable
• Meets quality standards
• Is versioned and backward-compatible
• Provides clear APIs for access

Think of it like a software product. It has users, features, releases, and support.

Examples of data products:

• Customer 360: A unified view of customer data (demographics, transactions, interactions)
• Product catalog: Canonical list of all products with attributes, pricing, inventory
• Sales metrics: Pre-aggregated KPIs for dashboards and reports
• Behavioral features: Engineered features for ML models (e.g., "days since last purchase," "average order value")

Each of these is not just a table in a database. It is a maintained, versioned product with consumers who depend on it.

The Principles of Data Products

Building data products requires a mindset shift. Here are the core principles:

Principle 1: Domain Ownership

Each data product is owned by a specific domain team — the team closest to the data and its business context.

Examples:

• Marketing owns customer segmentation data
• Finance owns revenue and cost data
• Operations owns supply chain data

Ownership means:

• The team defines the schema
• The team ensures data quality
• The team responds to consumer needs
• The team evolves the product over time

Without ownership, data products degrade into data lakes.

Principle 2: Consumer-Centric Design

Data products are built for consumers, not producers.

Ask:

• Who will use this data?
• What questions do they need to answer?
• What format do they prefer?
• How fresh does the data need to be?
• What quality do they require?

Do not build data products in a vacuum. Build them with consumers at the table.

Principle 3: Self-Service Access

Consumers should not need to email the data team to get access. They should discover the product in a catalog, read the documentation, and start using it — all self-service.

Requirements for self-service:

• Clear API (REST, SQL, or object store)
• Sample queries and use cases
• Schema documentation
• Authentication and authorization
• Usage examples and tutorials

Principle 4: Quality by Design

Data products must meet quality standards before they are published.

Quality dimensions:

• Completeness: No unexpected nulls or missing records
• Accuracy: Data matches source of truth
• Consistency: Related fields do not contradict each other
• Timeliness: Data is fresh enough for its use case
• Validity: Values fall within expected ranges

Implement automated quality checks. Publish quality metrics. Alert owners when quality degrades.

Principle 5: Versioning and Contracts

Like software, data products evolve. But consumers depend on them. Breaking changes cause chaos.

Best practices:

• Use semantic versioning (v1, v2, v3)
• Maintain backward compatibility within major versions
• Deprecate old versions gradually (6-12 months notice)
• Publish a changelog with every release

If you need to remove a field, do not just delete it. Mark it deprecated in v1.5, remove it in v2.0, and give consumers time to migrate.

Principle 6: Discoverability and Documentation

A data product nobody can find is useless. Invest in discoverability.

What consumers need:

• A searchable data catalog
• Rich metadata (owner, purpose, schema, freshness)
• Sample queries
• Data lineage (where did this come from?)
• Related data products

Tools like Atlan, Collibra, Alation, or DataHub make this possible.

Building Data Products: A Practical Framework

Here is how to move from data lakes to data products:

Step 1: Identify Core Use Cases

Do not build data products speculatively. Start with real consumer needs.

Ask:

• What analyses do teams run repeatedly?
• What features do ML models use most often?
• What dashboards do executives rely on?

These are candidates for data products.

Step 2: Assign Ownership

For each candidate, identify the domain team best positioned to own it.

Ownership criteria:

• Who understands the business context?
• Who maintains the source data?
• Who has capacity to support consumers?

Formalize ownership. Make it part of team OKRs.

Step 3: Define the Product

Work with consumers to define the product.

Key questions:

• What data should it include?
• What schema makes sense?
• How fresh does it need to be?
• What quality is required?
• Who should have access?

Document answers. This becomes your product spec.

Step 4: Build the Pipeline

Create the pipeline to produce the data product.

Typical steps:

• Ingest from source systems
• Clean and validate
• Transform and aggregate
• Publish to data warehouse, feature store, or API

Automate everything. Manual pipelines do not scale.

Step 5: Implement Quality Gates

Add automated tests to catch quality issues before they reach consumers.

Example tests:

• Row count within expected range
• No nulls in critical fields
• Referential integrity (joins work correctly)
• Data freshness (updated on schedule)

If tests fail, do not publish the update. Alert the owner.

Step 6: Publish and Document

Make the data product accessible. Publish it to your data catalog with:

• Clear description
• Schema documentation
• Sample queries
• Contact info for the owner

Send an announcement to potential consumers. Make noise. If they do not know it exists, they will not use it.

Step 7: Monitor and Iterate

Track usage. Collect feedback. Evolve the product.

Metrics to track:

• Number of consumers
• Query volume
• Data freshness
• Quality incidents
• Consumer satisfaction

Hold quarterly reviews. What is working? What is broken? What should we add?

The Data Product Team Structure

Centralized data teams do not scale. Federated data product teams do.

Old model: Central data team builds everything

Problems:

• Bottleneck: Every request waits in a queue
• Context gap: Centralized team does not understand domain nuances
• No ownership: When something breaks, everyone points fingers

New model: Domain teams own data products

Each domain team (marketing, finance, ops) owns the data products for their domain.

Central data team provides:

• Platforms and tools (data pipelines, catalogs, quality frameworks)
• Standards and best practices
• Support and training

Domain teams provide:

• Domain expertise
• Product ownership
• Consumer support

This is the "data mesh" model. It scales because it distributes responsibility.

Data Products vs Feature Stores

Are data products just feature stores?

Not quite. Feature stores are a specific type of data product — one optimized for ML.

Data products serve any consumer (analysts, dashboards, ML models).

Feature stores serve only ML models. They are optimized for:

• Training-serving consistency (same features in dev and prod)
• Point-in-time correctness (avoid data leakage)
• Low-latency access (serve features in real-time)

Feature stores are data products. But not all data products are feature stores.

Real-World Impact: From Swamp to Product Catalog

Consider two companies:

Company A: Data Lake Chaos

• 80,000 tables in the data lake
• No catalog, no documentation
• Each team builds its own customer table
• Data quality unknown until models fail
• Analysts spend 70% of time finding data
• AI projects take 12 months to go live

Company B: Data Product Discipline

• 200 curated data products
• Every product documented in a catalog
• One canonical customer product
• Quality monitored and alerted
• Analysts find data in minutes
• AI projects go live in 3 months

The difference is not technology. It is philosophy. Company B treats data as a product, not a dumping ground.

Common Objections (And Why They Are Wrong)

Objection 1: "We do not have resources to build data products"

Reality: You are already spending resources maintaining messy data lakes. Redirecting that effort to data products pays for itself.

Objection 2: "Data products are too rigid"

Reality: Data products are versioned. You can evolve them. They are more flexible than data lakes because changes are controlled and communicated.

Objection 3: "Our data is too messy to productize"

Reality: That is exactly why you need data products. Start small. Pick one high-value dataset. Clean it up. Publish it. Learn. Repeat.

The Transition Roadmap

You cannot flip a switch and convert your data lake into data products overnight. Here is the path:

Quarter 1: Pilot

• Identify 3 high-value datasets
• Assign owners
• Build the first data products
• Publish to a catalog

Quarter 2: Scale

• Add 10 more data products
• Train domain teams on standards
• Implement automated quality checks

Quarter 3: Adopt

• Migrate key consumers to data products
• Deprecate redundant datasets in the lake
• Measure impact (time to insight, data quality incidents)

Quarter 4: Expand

• Add 20 more data products
• Launch self-service access
• Build dashboards to track usage

Within a year, you have 30-50 high-quality data products. The data lake still exists — but it is raw storage, not the interface for consumers.

From Chaos to Clarity

Data lakes promised simplicity. They delivered complexity.

Data products promise discipline. They deliver clarity.

The shift from lakes to products is not just technical. It is cultural. It requires domain teams to take ownership. It requires consumers to shift from ad hoc queries to structured products. It requires leadership to invest in data quality, not just data volume.

But the payoff is real:

• Faster AI development
• Higher model quality
• Better business decisions
• Less wasted effort

Your data is not a liability. It is an asset. Treat it like one. Build products, not swamps.