Latest News & Resources

The Pilot That Never Grew Up

Your data science team just completed a successful proof-of-concept. The demo went perfectly. The model achieved 89% accuracy. Stakeholders were impressed. Everyone agreed: "This is valuable. Let us scale it."

That was 11 months ago.

The pilot is still running with 15 users. It has not scaled to the broader organization. It probably never will.

Welcome to the pilot graveyard—where promising AI projects go to die after successful POCs.

A 2024 Forrester study found that 68% of AI proofs-of-concept never scale beyond pilot phase. Another study by VentureBeat put the number at 76%. Regardless of the exact statistic, the pattern is clear: Most AI pilots fail to scale.

Not because the technology does not work. The pilot proved it works. But because scaling requires different capabilities, different planning, and different organizational support than pilots do.

This article dissects why pilots fail to scale and provides a framework for building pilots that are designed to grow.

The Seven Deadly Sins of AI Pilots

Most pilots are set up to fail from day one. Here is why.

Sin 1: Built on Shortcuts

The Pilot Approach: Data scientist manually exports data from three systems. Cleans it in Python scripts on their laptop. Trains a model. Runs predictions in a Jupyter notebook. Emails results to pilot users.

Why This Works for Pilots: Fast. Flexible. No dependencies on IT or engineering teams.

Why This Fails at Scale: Nothing is automated. Data extraction requires manual work daily. The data scientist becomes a bottleneck. No one else can run the model. When the data scientist leaves or gets reassigned, the pilot dies.

Real Example: A healthcare company built a readmission risk model. The pilot served 2 hospitals with 30 clinicians. Data scientist manually extracted patient data weekly, ran predictions, and emailed results.

Pilot was successful. Leadership wanted to scale to 40 hospitals and 1,200 clinicians.

Problem: The manual process could not scale. Automating required 8 months of engineering work to integrate with their EHR system, build automated pipelines, and create a user interface.

The 8-month timeline seemed too long. The budget was not approved. The pilot stayed at 2 hospitals. Eventually, it was deprecated.

Cost: $600K invested in pilot with no production return.

Sin 2: Unclear Business Ownership

The Pilot Approach: Data science team owns the pilot. They build it. They maintain it. They report results.

Why This Works for Pilots: Technical team has control. They can iterate quickly. No dependencies on business stakeholders.

Why This Fails at Scale: Business teams have not bought in. They view it as "the data science project"—not their responsibility. When it is time to scale, no business leader champions it. Budget is not allocated. Users are not mobilized. The pilot languishes.

Real Example: A fintech built a fraud detection model. Data science owned the pilot. It ran for 9 months with 5 fraud analysts using it.

When data science proposed scaling to all 60 analysts, the fraud department said: "We never asked for this. We have our existing system. Why do we need another tool?"

No business sponsor. No organizational pull. The pilot was ignored.

Cost: $420K wasted on a pilot with no path to scale.

Sin 3: Success Metrics That Do Not Matter

The Pilot Approach: Success is defined by technical metrics: accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score.

Why This Works for Pilots: Easy to measure. Objective. Data scientists can calculate these.

Why This Fails at Scale: Business leaders do not care about F1 scores. They care about revenue, cost, time, and customer satisfaction.

If you cannot articulate business value, you cannot justify scaling investment.

Real Example: A logistics company built a route optimization model. Pilot metrics: Accuracy: 92%. Latency: 230ms. Throughput: 10,000 routes/hour.

They presented these to the CFO to request $800K to scale.

CFO asked: "How much money does this save us?"

Team had no answer. They never measured cost savings during the pilot.

Scaling budget: Denied.

They later calculated it would save $2.1M annually. But by then, organizational support had eroded.

Cost: Delayed value realization by 18 months. Competitor launched similar capability first.

Sin 4: Ignored Integration Complexity

The Pilot Approach: Model runs standalone. Users access it via a separate dashboard or receive emailed results.

Why This Works for Pilots: No integration required. Avoids lengthy IT approval processes. Ships fast.

Why This Fails at Scale: Users will not adopt tools that require them to leave their primary workflows. Integration with existing systems (ERP, CRM, dashboards) is essential for adoption.

Integration is hard. It requires coordination across multiple teams, approvals, security reviews, and testing. If you have not planned for this during the pilot, scaling stalls.

Real Example: An insurance company built a claims triage model. Pilot used a web app. Adjusters logged in, uploaded claim photos, received triage recommendations.

It worked. But only 12% of adjusters used it consistently.

Too much friction.

Scaling required integration with the claims system. That required: API development (3 months). Security review (6 weeks). UAT testing (4 weeks). Training updates (3 weeks).

Timeline: 6 months. Budget required: $250K.

Leadership lost patience. Project was deprioritized.

Cost: $550K pilot investment with minimal production use.

Sin 5: Pilot-Sized Infrastructure

The Pilot Approach: Model runs on the data scientist's laptop or a single cloud instance. Data is stored in CSV files or a small database.

Why This Works for Pilots: Cheap. Simple. No infrastructure approvals needed.

Why This Fails at Scale: Laptop infrastructure cannot serve 500 users. CSV files cannot handle production data volumes. No redundancy means downtime. No monitoring means failures go undetected.

Scaling requires production-grade infrastructure: load balancers, auto-scaling, monitoring, alerting, backup, disaster recovery.

If you have not budgeted or planned for this, scaling stops.

Real Example: A retail company built a product recommendation engine. Pilot served 100 beta users. Model ran on a single AWS EC2 instance. Data stored in SQLite.

Success! Leadership wanted to scale to 2M customers.

Infrastructure requirements for 2M users: Auto-scaling infrastructure ($120K/year). Database migration to PostgreSQL cluster ($80K setup). CDN for model serving ($40K/year). Monitoring and alerting ($30K/year). Total: $270K year 1, $190K annually thereafter.

This infrastructure cost was never included in the pilot business case. When it surfaced during scaling planning, finance balked.

Project delayed 9 months while teams debated infrastructure approach.

Cost: 9-month delay meant $1.4M in lost revenue from recommendations.

Sin 6: No Change Management

The Pilot Approach: Find 10-20 enthusiastic early adopters. They volunteer to test the AI tool.

Why This Works for Pilots: Early adopters forgive imperfections. They provide valuable feedback. They champion the tool.

Why This Fails at Scale: The next 200 users are not early adopters. They are skeptical. They are busy. They have existing processes. They need training. They need support. They need reasons to change.

Without structured change management, adoption stalls at 15-20%.

Real Example: A manufacturing company built a quality inspection AI. Pilot with 15 quality engineers was successful. Adoption: 90%.

Scaled to 200 engineers. Adoption after 3 months: 18%.

Why? No training program (early adopters learned organically). No support system (early adopters figured things out themselves). No incentives to adopt (early adopters were intrinsically motivated). No communication about why (early adopters were already believers).

The majority of users reverted to manual inspection because learning the new tool was not worth the effort.

Cost: $900K invested in scaling infrastructure with 18% adoption.

Sin 7: Pilot Metrics Look Good, Production Metrics Look Bad

The Pilot Approach: Select ideal use cases for the pilot. Clean data. Well-defined scenarios. Cooperative users.

Why This Works for Pilots: Demonstrates capability. Builds confidence. Shows what is possible.

Why This Fails at Scale: Production data is messier. Use cases are more diverse. Edge cases emerge. What worked in the curated pilot fails in the wild.

If you have not tested the model on realistic production conditions, you will discover failures after scaling—when the stakes are high and trust is fragile.

Real Example: A bank built a credit underwriting model. Pilot on 500 carefully selected applications: 91% accuracy.

Scaled to all applications (50K/month). Accuracy in production: 78%.

Why? Pilot excluded edge cases (self-employed, recent immigrants). Pilot had cleaner data (manual QA before modeling). Pilot time period was economically stable (trained during low volatility).

Production accuracy was unacceptably low. Trust evaporated. Model was pulled from production after 6 weeks.

Cost: $1.1M wasted. 18 months until they could try again (trust had to rebuild).

The Scale-Ready Pilot Framework

Here is how to build pilots that are designed to scale.

Principle 1: Pilot for Production, Not Just Proof

Instead of asking: "Can we build a model that works?"

Ask: "Can we build a model that works in production at scale?"

This means:

During Pilot, Test: Integration with existing systems (even if rudimentary). Realistic data volumes (not just curated samples). Edge cases and failure modes. User adoption barriers.

Build: Automated data pipelines (even simple ones). Basic monitoring and alerting. Minimal viable integration.

Document: What would it take to scale? (infrastructure, integration, team). What are the gaps between pilot and production? What is the rough cost to scale?

If you discover during the pilot that scaling will cost $2M and take 18 months, you can make an informed decision about whether to proceed.

Principle 2: Secure Business Ownership from Day 1

Before the pilot starts, identify:

Business Sponsor: Senior leader who will champion scaling (VP or C-level).

Business Owner: Operational leader who will own the scaled solution (Director-level).

Budget Owner: Who will fund scaling? (confirm they are committed).

The pilot is not a data science experiment. It is a business initiative with technical execution.

Hold business owners accountable: They define success metrics (business, not just technical). They participate in design (ensure it solves their problem). They commit to scaling if pilot succeeds (not "we will see").

Red flag: If you cannot get a VP-level sponsor before starting the pilot, do not start the pilot. It will never scale.

Principle 3: Define Business Metrics Upfront

Before building the model, write down:

Current State: Baseline performance (e.g., "manual processing takes 3 hours per case"). Baseline cost (e.g., "$450K annually in labor").

Target State: Target performance (e.g., "automated processing in <15 minutes"). Target cost (e.g., "$200K annually—55% reduction").

Measurement Plan: How will we measure impact during pilot? How will we measure impact at scale? What data do we need to collect?

ROI Calculation: Pilot ROI (may be negative—that is okay). Scaled ROI (must be strongly positive).

If you cannot articulate clear business metrics, do not build the pilot. You will not be able to justify scaling.

Principle 4: Plan Integration from Day 1

During pilot design, answer:

Where will predictions be consumed? Existing dashboard? CRM? ERP? Email? API?

What integration work is required? API development? Database connections? UI modifications?

What approvals are needed? Security review? IT architecture approval? Vendor contracts?

What is the timeline and cost?

Then, during the pilot:

Build a prototype integration (even if rough). This: Proves integration is feasible. Surfaces hidden complexities early. Demonstrates what the scaled experience will look like.

If integration turns out to be prohibitively expensive or complex, kill the pilot early. Do not wait until after 6 months of model development to discover integration is impossible.

Principle 5: Test Production Conditions

During the pilot:

Use production-like data: Include edge cases. Include data quality issues. Include diversity of scenarios.

Use production-like volumes: If production is 10K predictions/day, test 1K/day in pilot. Stress-test the system.

Use production-like users: Not just enthusiastic early adopters. Include skeptics. Include busy users who will not tolerate friction.

This surfaces problems early when they are cheap to fix.

A pilot that only works under ideal conditions is not a pilot. It is a demo.

Principle 6: Build Change Management into Pilot

Even for a 20-person pilot, practice change management:

Training: How will users learn the tool? Test training materials during pilot.

Support: How will users get help? Set up a support channel during pilot.

Communication: Why should users adopt? Test messaging during pilot.

Incentives: What motivates adoption? Experiment with incentives during pilot.

Measure adoption: Percentage of pilot users actively using the tool. Frequency of use. User satisfaction scores.

If pilot adoption is <70%, scaling will fail. Fix adoption during the pilot before scaling.

Principle 7: Budget for Scale from Day 1

Pilot business case should include TWO budgets:

Pilot Budget: $50K-$150K. Model development. Pilot infrastructure. Pilot user testing.

Scale Budget: $200K-$1M. Production infrastructure. Integration work. Change management. Training and support. Ongoing operations (annual).

Both budgets should be approved before starting the pilot.

If the organization is only willing to fund the pilot but not scaling, do not start the pilot. You will build something that can never be used.

Case Study: A Pilot Designed to Scale

A pharmaceutical company wanted to use AI to accelerate clinical trial patient matching.

Traditional Pilot Approach (what they avoided): Build model on 1,000 historical trials. Test with 2 study coordinators. Measure accuracy. Celebrate success. Stall during scaling for 18 months.

Scale-Ready Pilot Approach (what they did):

Week 1: Secure Business Ownership. VP of Clinical Operations committed as sponsor. Director of Trial Recruitment committed as owner. CFO pre-approved $400K for scaling (if pilot succeeds).

Week 2: Define Business Metrics. Current state: 45 days average to identify eligible patients. Target: Reduce to 15 days. Success metric: 60% reduction in time-to-recruit. ROI: $2.8M annually (faster trials equals faster drug approvals).

Weeks 3-8: Build with Integration in Mind. Developed model (achieved 82% accuracy). Built prototype integration with trial management system. Tested API performance with production data volumes. Identified scaling requirements: AWS infrastructure, data pipeline automation.

Weeks 9-10: Pilot with Production-Like Conditions. Selected 4 study coordinators (2 enthusiasts, 2 skeptics). Included 15 diverse trial types (not just easy cases). Measured time-to-recruit reduction: 58% (close to target). Measured adoption: 85% (coordinators used it consistently).

Week 11: Plan for Scale. Documented integration requirements ($180K, 4 months). Documented infrastructure requirements ($40K annual). Documented training program (3 days of content, 2 trainers). Documented support model (dedicated support person, 0.5 FTE).

Week 12: Business Case for Scale. Pilot delivered 58% time reduction (proof of value). Scaling cost: $400K year 1, $150K annually thereafter. Scaled ROI: $2.8M annual value divided by $400K investment equals 700% year 1 ROI. Decision: Approved on the spot.

Months 4-7: Scaled to 40 Coordinators. Infrastructure deployed. Integration completed. Training delivered. 40 coordinators onboarded.

Results: Adoption after 6 months: 78%. Time-to-recruit reduction: 61%. Annual value: $2.8M. Total investment (pilot plus scale): $550K. Year 1 ROI: 509%.

What Made This Different: They planned for scale from day 1. Business ownership was secured upfront. Business metrics were defined before building. Integration was prototyped during the pilot. Change management was tested. Scaling budget was approved before pilot completion.

The pilot was not a technical proof-of-concept. It was a business pilot designed to grow.

The Pilot-to-Production Checklist

Before starting your next AI pilot, ensure these boxes are checked:

Business Foundation: VP-level sponsor identified and committed. Business owner assigned (will own scaled solution). Business metrics defined (not just technical metrics). Baseline performance measured. Target performance defined. ROI calculation complete (for pilot and scale).

Technical Foundation: Data sources identified and accessible. Data quality assessed (realistic, not idealized). Edge cases identified for testing. Infrastructure approach defined (pilot and scale). Integration requirements scoped. Security and compliance requirements understood.

Organizational Foundation: Pilot users identified (include skeptics, not just enthusiasts). Training plan drafted. Support model designed. Change management approach defined. Communication plan ready.

Financial Foundation: Pilot budget approved ($50K-$150K typical). Scaling budget pre-approved ($200K-$1M typical). Ongoing operational cost estimated. Business case approved by CFO.

If you cannot check all these boxes, you are building a demo, not a pilot.

Demos are fine for learning. But they should not be confused with production-bound projects.

The ITSoli Pilot-to-Production Service

ITSoli has designed a specific engagement model for pilots that scale.

What Is Different:

Day 1: Scale Planning. Before writing code, we plan for production: Integration requirements scoped. Infrastructure approach defined. Change management planned. Scaling budget estimated.

Weeks 1-12: Build for Production. Pilots are not shortcuts. We build: Automated data pipelines (minimal but functional). Basic monitoring and alerts. Prototype integration with your systems. Production-like testing.

Week 12: Decision Point. Clear go/no-go decision based on: Business value delivered in pilot. Cost to scale. ROI projection.

Months 4-7: Scaling Support. If pilot succeeds, we support scaling: Production infrastructure deployment. Full integration buildout. Training and change management. Handoff to your operations team.

Pricing:

Pilot Phase: $80K-$120K (12 weeks). Includes scale planning. Includes prototype integration. Includes business case for scaling.

Scaling Phase: $150K-$350K (3-4 months). Only if pilot succeeds. Contingent pricing: no success, no scaling fee.

This de-risks your investment. You pay for scaling only if the pilot proves value.

Success Rate:

Industry average pilot-to-production rate: 24-32%.

ITSoli pilot-to-production rate: 73%.

Why the difference? We design for production from day 1.

Stop Building Demos, Start Building Products

The pilot graveyard is full of technically successful projects that never scaled.

The problem is not the technology. The problem is the approach.

Pilots built as technical proofs-of-concept fail to scale. Pilots built as business prototypes succeed.

Before your next pilot: Secure business ownership. Define business metrics. Plan for integration. Budget for scaling. Design change management.

If you cannot do these things, do not start the pilot. You will waste 6 months building something that will never be used.

Build fewer pilots. Build them right. Scale them fast.

That is how AI becomes valuable.